Before anything else: Galileo AI no longer exists as a standalone product. Google acquired it in mid-2025 and folded its generative design technology into Google Stitch, a Gemini-powered tool now offered free during its beta. If you’re reading a review — including an earlier version of this one — that describes Galileo AI as a separate, independently-priced product, that information is out of date. Here’s what actually exists today.
Quick Verdict
What was Galileo AI is now Google Stitch, and it’s currently free with daily usage limits rather than a paid subscription. If you want AI-generated UI mockups from a text prompt and don’t mind Google Labs’ beta status (and its usage caps), Stitch is the direct successor and there’s no separate product to compare it against anymore.
- Currently free with generous monthly generation limits
- Stitch 2.0 (March 2026) added multi-screen generation, infinite canvas, and voice input
- One reviewer rated it 7/10 specifically because it’s “not consistently reliable enough” for a sole workflow
- Still beta-badged, with availability limited in some countries
What Happened, and What Stitch Is
Google acquired Galileo AI in mid-2025 and integrated its generative design technology into Stitch, part of Google Labs. Former Galileo AI users can reportedly import their previous conversation history through Stitch’s settings. The product itself works the same way Galileo AI did. Describe an interface in plain language — “a mobile onboarding flow for a fitness app” — and it generates a styled UI design based on that prompt, which you refine from there. It’s aimed at the earliest concept stage of design, not final production output, same as before the acquisition.
Pricing
Stitch is currently free, with no paid tier at all — a genuine change from Galileo AI’s previous subscription model. Access runs on a daily usage cap that resets at midnight UTC rather than a monthly billing cycle. Reported specific limits vary across sources we checked. Figures cited include 350-400 standard generations and 15-200 redesign generations per day, depending on the source and possibly the specific date checked, since Google Labs products change usage limits during beta without much notice. We could not pin down one consistent, currently-accurate number. Treat any specific daily cap you read, including here, as approximate and subject to change. Confirm your current allowance directly inside the Stitch interface rather than from any published figure.
Real-World Use Cases
- A founder preparing a pitch deck uses Stitch to generate a handful of visual directions for an app concept overnight, at no cost, rather than commissioning early design work before there’s funding to pay for it.
- A former Galileo AI user with existing project history imports that history into Stitch through its settings and continues where the old product left off, minus the subscription fee it used to charge.
- A team with a mature, established design system skips Stitch (and Uizard) entirely for day-to-day work, since AI-generated screens rarely match existing design language automatically and the manual reconciliation work outweighs the speed benefit.
Where It Fits in a Design Workflow
| Stage | Stitch’s role |
|---|---|
| Concept exploration | Strong — fast generation of multiple visual directions, at no cost |
| Wireframing | Useful as a starting point, needs manual refinement |
| Production-ready design | Weak — typically needs to be rebuilt properly in Figma or similar |
| Design systems / consistency | Not its purpose — it generates individual screens, not systematic components |
Who It’s a Good Fit For
Founders and product managers who need to visualize an idea fast for a pitch deck, early user testing, or internal discussion — before committing design resources to it. Being free removes what used to be Galileo AI’s biggest barrier to casual, exploratory use. Less useful for teams that already have a mature design system and just need to extend it, since AI-generated screens rarely match existing design language automatically, regardless of which tool generated them.
Stitch (Formerly Galileo AI) vs. Uizard
Both generate UI from prompts or sketches. Stitch is now free with daily limits and Google/Gemini’s backing; Uizard charges from $12/month but offers more mature project management, unlimited projects at higher tiers, and collaborative team editing that a beta product doesn’t yet match. If cost is the deciding factor, Stitch wins outright. If you need to manage many ongoing projects with a team, Uizard’s structure is currently the more complete product.
Which one fits you: Stitch or Uizard?
Since Galileo AI’s own paid tiers no longer exist, this compares the two named options in this review — Google Stitch (free, beta, daily caps) and Uizard (from $12/month) — using the tradeoffs described above. Answer three questions for a transparent recommendation.
Google Stitch (free)
You’re exploring one idea at no cost — Stitch’s free daily-capped access covers that with nothing to pay.
Method: each “pay/multiple projects/team” answer scores 1 point toward Uizard, each free/single-idea/solo answer scores 0. A score of 2 or more recommends Uizard; below that recommends Stitch. Based solely on the tradeoffs stated in this review — no data beyond what’s written above.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Completely free, removing what used to be Galileo AI’s biggest barrier to casual use | Daily usage caps, with the exact figures inconsistently reported and subject to change without notice |
| Backed by Google/Gemini rather than an independent startup’s uncertain runway | Explicitly a Google Labs beta product — no guarantee it stays free or even continues to exist in its current form |
| Former Galileo AI users can reportedly import prior conversation history | Generated screens don’t automatically match an existing brand’s design system |
| Fast concept-stage generation from a plain-language prompt | Weak for production-ready design — still needs to be rebuilt properly elsewhere |
Detailed Analysis
Why this review had to be rewritten around an acquisition
Reviewing Galileo AI honestly means acknowledging that the product being reviewed no longer exists under that name or that pricing model — it was acquired and absorbed into Stitch. That’s a materially different situation from a normal price or feature update, and it’s why this review leads with the acquisition rather than treating it as a footnote. Anyone landing here searching for “Galileo AI pricing” needs to know immediately that the number they’re about to read doesn’t apply anymore, before anything else on the page.
Free doesn’t mean risk-free for a real workflow
Stitch’s zero cost is a genuine advantage for exploratory, low-stakes use — but it comes from being an unproven Google Labs beta product, not a mature offering with a stable business model behind it. Google Labs has a track record of introducing paid tiers or shutting down beta products after the experimentation period ends. Anyone building a repeatable workflow around Stitch, rather than using it for occasional one-off concept generation, should treat the current free access as temporary. Have a fallback plan — likely Uizard’s paid tier — ready if that changes.
Our Rating, and How We Reached It
| Criteria | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | 10/10 | Currently free with no paid tier at all — the strongest possible score on price alone. |
| Concept-stage usefulness | 8/10 | Fast, prompt-based generation is genuinely useful for early visual exploration and pitch material. |
| Reliability / stability | 4/10 | Beta status, inconsistent usage-limit reporting, and no guarantee of continued free access all count against it. |
| Production readiness | 3/10 | Same limitation Galileo AI always had — output needs to be rebuilt properly for real design systems. |
Overall: 6.25/10. Excellent for what it costs and what it’s meant to do — fast concept exploration — but scored down for beta instability and the unresolved question of whether free access continues. Re-verify current usage limits and pricing directly inside the Stitch interface before relying on it for anything ongoing.
PROOF Score
Overall: 7.2 / 10 — Recommended. Scored under our PROOF methodology — five checkable pillars, not a vibe.
Should You Use Stitch (formerly Galileo AI)?
- Use it for fast, free concept exploration — a pitch deck, an early idea, or a single visual direction with no budget to spend.
- Don’t build a critical workflow around it without a fallback — it’s an unproven Google Labs beta product with no guarantee of staying free.
- Choose Uizard instead if you’re managing multiple ongoing projects with a team and need mature project management, not just one-off generation.
- Ignore any pricing you find under the “Galileo AI” name — that product no longer exists, and the number is out of date.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Galileo AI still available under its old name?
No — it’s been fully transitioned into Google Stitch and no longer operates as a standalone product or brand. Any current listing still using the Galileo AI name is describing a discontinued product.
Can Stitch’s output match my existing brand design system?
Not automatically — expect to manually adjust generated designs to match existing brand guidelines and components, the same limitation Galileo AI had before the acquisition.
Will Stitch stay free?
We can’t promise that, and neither can any other reviewer. It’s explicitly a Google Labs beta product, and Google Labs products have historically introduced paid tiers or been discontinued after their beta period. Don’t build a business-critical workflow around a free beta product without a contingency plan.
How We Assessed This
The acquisition and product transition are corroborated across multiple independent sources. Specific current usage-limit figures could not be confirmed to one consistent number and are flagged as approximate rather than stated as fact. Disclosure: this page contains no affiliate links currently — the product URL is a plain link.
Related
Alternatives worth comparing
